Dear Mr. President,
Homeland Security. Not only a bottomless money pit but an agency
that has no purpose, provides virtually no useful intelligence and can’t
account for $1.4 billion earmarked for their latest fiasco, “fusion centers,” joint
federal, state and local intelligence-gathering centers, a last ditch effort to
carve out a niche within the security bureaucracy for themselves. But Congressional
investigators found that 4 of 72 “fusion centers” didn’t even exist and that
the ones that did often violated privacy laws and created reports that contained
no useful information, sat on shelves for months or were never published and,
often as not, were “unrelated to terrorism.” The bureaucratic sloths at Homeland
Security cried foul, claimed the investigating committee didn’t know what they
were talking about but it sounds like those officials should be charged with lying
to Congress since they knew of the problems for years but hid them and claimed that
the fusion centers were highly valuable and formed the centerpiece of Homeland
Security counterterrorism efforts. Or, if they wiggle out of that charge, how
about misappropriation of funds, since a lot of the federal money earmarked for
“fusion centers” was diverted to state and local agencies for things like SUVs
and flat screen TVs. My question is this, Mr. President: If Homeland Security was
created to “connect the dots” and share intelligence information with other
agencies but can’t and doesn’t (the National Counterterrorism Center actually
performs those functions) why do we have a Homeland Security anyway? And if
they can lose $1.4 billion on one program, how much have they pissed away total?
Is Homeland Security like employment for the incompetent? How about trying
them at something useful and productive like repairing roads and bridges or guarding
the Y-12 nuclear arms plant in Oak Ridge from 82-year-old activist nuns? God
knows we need a lot done here at home. Or maybe this is one of those hapless agencies
in the Ship of State that just has to be eliminated and the money used for education
and infrastructure. I been ranting about this boondoggle agency for a long time
and now it’s official. Senator Tom Coburn (R, Oklahoma) says, “Homeland
Security is probably the most ineffective agency in the government besides
Social Security.” I disagree on the Social Security part but
he’s on the mark about Homeland Security. Like all the other “security”
agencies, this one appears to be just another mirage.
No comments:
Post a Comment