Dear
Mr. President,
Just when we’re on the
verge of a serious debate about your targeted assassinations program, Feinstein
and Brennan, in a classic case of misdirection, shift the discussion to a
consideration of setting up a secret court that will either 1) approve drone
strikes (unlikely) or 2) approve names to go on your Kill List (most likely,
just American names). Wonderful. Another secret court modeled on the secret FISA
court created by Congress in 1978 when the National Security Agency and the FBI
were illegally eavesdropping on Americans and the executive branch was incapable
of policing itself. (Nothing changes). And how effective is the FISA court? In 2011
it approved 1,745 requests and rejected—da-dum!—zero. A rubber stamp court that
gives the appearance of legality to an illegal operation. A drone court would
be the same ruber stamp eyewash. But a drone court would be a whole different ball
game that even judges aren’t keen on. At an ABA meeting last November, James
Robertson, a retired FISA judge, rejected the idea that judges should approve “death
warrants.” (Today’s NYT, p. A1) The article quotes William C. Banks, a law professor
at Syracuse University: “It’s still secret. The target wouldn’t be represented.
It’s a mechanism that wouldn’t satisfy critics or advance the due process cause
much.” Nor would it stop the killing of innocent civilians or hold people
accountable. Nothing would be made public, no national discussion, no change in
our irrational and violent foreign policies and it would not bring to a close
our unending war of terrorism. But Feinstein and Brennan’s diversion was
successful. They didn’t want to discuss the legal and moral issues around
killing people without evidence, oversight legal recourse or accountability. That’s
dangerous territory. That gets into the evil Brennan and you have done and Congress’s
failure to stop it. There’s another article in this morning’s Times about the renegade Amish bishop,
Samuel Mullet, who received a 15-year prison sentence for directing his
followers in a reign of terror against other Amish he disagreed with. They cut
off the beards of the men and the hair of women. They were convicted of hate
crimes and all sentenced to prison terms of 1 to 7 years. But Samuel Mullet. 15
years for cutting off hair? While Brennan, the architect of the ultimate hate
crimes against humanity, responsible for thousands of deaths remains at large
and is nominated to head the CIA? Talk about warped justice!
No comments:
Post a Comment