Dear Mr. President,
Congress may as well go ahead and approve
the Pentagon’s request for $200 million to upgrade Guantanamo. Looks like we’ll
need it for a long time to come, maybe even till Kingdom Come, as my mother
used to say. In a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing yesterday, assistant
secretary of defense for special operations, Michael Sheehan, said that the War
on Terror was likely to continue at least 10 to 20 years (today’s NYT, p. A6). Al
Qaeda, it turns out, hasn’t really been snuffed out, our $100+ billion a year
intelligence bureaucracy is finding new Al Qaedas popping up everywhere. Nobody
on the committee had a problem with that or with Sheehan’s estimate of 10 to 20
more years of war; they were only there to determine if the old 2001 “authorization
to use military force” needed to be updated since none of these new Al Qaedas are
actually connected to the 9/11 attacks. The Pentagon wants no changes to the
statute—“it suits us very well,” Mr. Sheehan said. Islamist militants like the
Nusra Front in Syria, one group of Syrian rebel fighters, for example, is a “Qaeda
affiliate.” “So we can expect drone strikes into Syria if we find Al Qaeda
there?” McCain asked Robert Taylor, the Pentagon’s general counsel, also at the
hearing. Mr. Taylor declined to speculate. McCain came close to stripping the
mask off the War on Terror, calling it “a war on Muslim extremists and Al Qaeda
and others.” It turns out there doesn’t need to be a real connection to the old
Al Qaeda, just an ideological one (and the ideology seems to be Islam itself). There
was no discussion about why we’re doing this or the morality of it; the only objection
came from Sen. Angus King (I-ME) who pointed out that the original 2001 statute
said nothing about “associated forces” of Al Qaeda. The administration’s theory,
he said, had “essentially rewritten the Constitution… because it was up to the
Congress to declare war.” All I got to say is, that’s not the only thing in the
Constitution your administration has rewritten, Mr. President. How about
indefinite detention? The right of habeas
corpus? The 1st and 4th amendments? What about the
Geneva Conventions and all the international laws and treaties we’ve broken
under your regime? Just because you call yourself a Democrat doesn’t mean you’re
one. And just because you’re a Nobel Peace Prize winner doesn’t mean you’re a
man of peace, either. Power corrupts and your corruption is shown in many ways
but especially in the ways of war.
No comments:
Post a Comment