Dear Mr. President,
Reading an article in today’s NYT (“How the U.S.
Is Interrogating A Qaeda Suspect” p. A9) is like falling down the rabbit hole. When
is invading another country not a crime of aggression? When Obama says it isn’t.
When is a prisoner of war not a prisoner of war? When Obama says he isn’t. And
when do the Geneva Conventions apply? When Obama says they do. So here’s Abu
Anas al-Liby, indicted on criminal charges in NYC, an alleged high value Al
Qaeda target, a citizen of Libya living in Libya, kidnapped by U.S. commandos off
the street in Tripoli and spirited away to the waiting U.S.S. San Antonio in
the Mediterranean where he’ll be interrogated without a lawyer present and
without being informed of his rights. All this, the raid, the kidnapping, the
rendition, the incarceration at sea, violates the Geneva Conventions, violates
the sovereignty of another country, violates U.S. law and violates basic human
rights. Your Nobel Peace Prize does not put you above the law, Mr. President. How
is your refusal to abide by the Geneva Conventions any different than Assad’s?
Or any other tyrant? You threatened to bomb Syria for Assad’s violation of the
Geneva Conventions when his troops used chemical weapons on August 21. All that
self-righteous talk about enforcing international law and the Geneva
Conventions and yet you violate them every day with your targeted
assassinations and drone strikes and 164 Guantanamo prisoners still held without
charges. And now the case of al-Liby shines more light on your arrogant
disregard of law. In your twisted logic, no laws protect al-Liby. He’s a member
of Al Qaeda and therefore an “enemy combatant,” a category invented by Bush
neocons to indefinitely incarcerate and brutalize prisoners. Holding prisoners
of war at sea is explicitly forbidden by the Geneva Conventions; but you say al-Liby
isn’t being held, he’s on a troop transport “in transit.” (Never mind it took more
than 2 months to transit Warsame while he was being interrogated.) And while in
transit a special team of agents is interrogating him with no witnesses or legal
representation and when they finish with him, what the FBI calls a “clean team”
of fresh agents will go through the interrogation process again, this time offering
legal representation and informing him of his rights so they can use it in a
court of law if they decide to prosecute. Or maybe they’ll take him straight to
Guantanamo. Welcome to the world of Obamalaw. Welcome to the rabbit hole.
No comments:
Post a Comment